|
Post by acidohm on Sept 7, 2017 20:19:44 GMT
Europe was very hot at times...
South of me if course...we were shivering!
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Sept 7, 2017 22:28:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Sept 8, 2017 15:32:04 GMT
Actually that is the link. Here it is again. www.temperature.global/It bring up this information current as of today Current Temperature: 65.19°F Current Deviation: 7.99°F (4.44°C) above normal 12M Avg Temperature: 56.68°F 12M Avg Deviation: 0.52°F (0.29°C) below normal 2015 average: 0.98 °F (0.54 °C) below normal 2016 average: 0.48 °F (0.27 °C) below normal Stations processed last hour: 58589 Last station processed: Louisburg, United States Update time: 2017-09-08 14:51:45 UTC I'll take your word and I think I even visited this page before. Now it just says DNS address not found (multiple times).
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Sept 8, 2017 15:40:35 GMT
Actually that is the link. Here it is again. www.temperature.global/It bring up this information current as of today Current Temperature: 65.19°F Current Deviation: 7.99°F (4.44°C) above normal 12M Avg Temperature: 56.68°F 12M Avg Deviation: 0.52°F (0.29°C) below normal 2015 average: 0.98 °F (0.54 °C) below normal 2016 average: 0.48 °F (0.27 °C) below normal Stations processed last hour: 58589 Last station processed: Louisburg, United States Update time: 2017-09-08 14:51:45 UTC I'll take your word and I think I even visited this page before. Now it just says DNS address not found (multiple times). Works great for me. Are you on a blacklist now Missouri?
|
|
birder
Level 3 Rank
Posts: 223
|
Post by birder on Sept 8, 2017 20:42:41 GMT
Link works for me and I check it regularly. I don't understand why the current deviation always seems circa 13 degrees F above normal but the 12 month average is below average, the same with 2015 and 2016 average. Also noted they no longer mention the hurricane days since the last major one, it was about 4036 days, understandable I suppose although I think it was based on cat.5 hurricanes so is debatable whether they have had one yet?
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Sept 8, 2017 21:57:38 GMT
I'll take your word and I think I even visited this page before. Now it just says DNS address not found (multiple times). Works great for me. Are you on a blacklist now Missouri? Must be. I thought I saw a drone dodging from tree to tree in my back yard. And the squirrels have been laughing at me. Do you guys use Google Chrome? This site can’t be reached www.temperature.global’s server DNS address could not be found.
DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Sept 8, 2017 23:46:39 GMT
Works great for me. Are you on a blacklist now Missouri? Must be. I thought I saw a drone dodging from tree to tree in my back yard. And the squirrels have been laughing at me. Do you guys use Google Chrome? This site can’t be reached www.temperature.global’s server DNS address could not be found.
DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAINYes, use Google chrome because my Win 7 hasn't accepted an update for a year. In November, I will triple check to make sure all information I need is backed up to my portable hard drives and reinstall Windows 7. Then I will go back to using IE as it is a better platform than Google. In the case of you getting the 404 type error, you actually could be on a govt black list. A potential cure would be picking up and moving to NK. Then there would be no question as to being blacklisted. An added bonus would be that you wouldn't have to worry about a NK bomb going off near you. 😂
|
|
|
Post by youngjasper on Sept 9, 2017 0:15:34 GMT
I could not see temperature.global website either, initially. I tried again later and it showed up. Cannot explain why. Using firefox.
(Have followed this board for some 8 years or so, just don't post much. But I sure enjoy reading the perspectives, comments, and opinions.)
young jasper
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Sept 9, 2017 0:27:47 GMT
I can see it but also can't understand the current deviation being SO high.
Current Temperature: 68.79°F Current Deviation: 11.59°F (6.44°C) above normal
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Sept 9, 2017 1:13:48 GMT
I can see it but also can't understand the current deviation being SO high. Current Temperature: 68.79°F Current Deviation: 11.59°F (6.44°C) above normal Define 'normal' like 'average' it is an elastic definition If you cannot define normal then deviations from it are also undefined. We are in an interglacial period in an ice age - shown graphically as: We are at the cold end of the Holocene interglacial with a distinct possibility we could drop back into an ice age. So tell us all again - what is "normal"?
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Sept 9, 2017 1:14:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Sept 9, 2017 12:23:53 GMT
I can see it but also can't understand the current deviation being SO high. Current Temperature: 68.79°F Current Deviation: 11.59°F (6.44°C) above normal Define 'normal' like 'average' it is an elastic definition If you cannot define normal then deviations from it are also undefined. We are in an interglacial period in an ice age - shown graphically as: We are at the cold end of the Holocene interglacial with a distinct possibility we could drop back into an ice age. So tell us all again - what is "normal"? Precisely! This is all anyone capable of critical thinking needs to consider on the subject of climate change and civilization. Humans and all our endeavors are just corks bobbing on the ocean with respect to what this planet's unimaginable energy, fueling known and unknown interactive cycles, is going to do next.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Sept 9, 2017 13:50:59 GMT
I'll take your word and I think I even visited this page before. Now it just says DNS address not found (multiple times). Weird, should be up, try this site. temperature.global/global.htmNope. I'm toast.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Sept 9, 2017 14:24:59 GMT
I can see it but also can't understand the current deviation being SO high. Current Temperature: 68.79°F Current Deviation: 11.59°F (6.44°C) above normal Define 'normal' like 'average' it is an elastic definition If you cannot define normal then deviations from it are also undefined. We are in an interglacial period in an ice age - shown graphically as: We are at the cold end of the Holocene interglacial with a distinct possibility we could drop back into an ice age. So tell us all again - what is "normal"? "Normal" is merely a statistical construct for looking at change. Like everything else related to climate "science", it is abused for self(cause)-serving purposes. Hence "noise" becomes reason for "awe". Thirty years as a definition of climate is arbitrary, whose ends are adjusted to serve the wished-for trend. Perhaps "normal" should become a time period within which "no trend" is observed. Thus variance within this period is incorporated in "normal". Of course, as you expand this period, the variance will also expand ... as shown in your graph. Disasters are wrapped up in noise ... so perhaps normal should be defined as a period of sufficient length that minimizes both trend and noise ... but at this point we may rapidly be running out of records to play with ... and then we have geography. So, what to do? So, here we are ... back at our starting point ... somewhat the worse for wear. Waiting for that climate repairman name of Al with his siren sing-song knack. "Son ... your normal's out of whack! And I am here to help you get it back."
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Sept 9, 2017 15:29:11 GMT
Define 'normal' like 'average' it is an elastic definition If you cannot define normal then deviations from it are also undefined. We are in an interglacial period in an ice age - shown graphically as: We are at the cold end of the Holocene interglacial with a distinct possibility we could drop back into an ice age. So tell us all again - what is "normal"? "Normal" is merely a statistical construct for looking at change. Like everything else related to climate "science", it is abused for self(cause)-serving purposes. Hence "noise" becomes reason for "awe". Thirty years as a definition of climate is arbitrary, whose ends are adjusted to serve the wished-for trend. Perhaps "normal" should become a time period within which "no trend" is observed. Thus variance within this period is incorporated in "normal". Of course, as you expand this period, the variance will also expand ... as shown in your graph. Disasters are wrapped up in noise ... so perhaps normal should be defined as a period of sufficient length that minimizes both trend and noise ... but at this point we may rapidly be running out of records to play with ... and then we have geography. So, what to do? So, here we are ... back at our starting point ... somewhat the worse for wear. Waiting for that climate repairman name of Al with his siren sing-song knack. "Son ... your normal's out of whack! And I am here to help you get it back." I don't think it's "normal" for a washed up politician with a complete lack of scientific credentials to garner world attention and enablement from the scientific community. But then again, who am I to question my "betters".
|
|