|
Post by hrizzo on Feb 13, 2016 10:50:40 GMT
nonentropic said:
Is there any article about this, or commentaries from fishermen or authorities? It seems that, at least from the original concept, Astro was right.
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Sept 19, 2015 8:15:31 GMT
yep it was this low 500 years ago before AGW About twelve years ago, a similar article about CO2 levels being the highest in the last 600 000 years, made me wonder... Till then, I had sort of believed the AWG conjecture; it seemed plausible. But then I realized something: Earth was 4500 million years old, and I had visited the Paleomap Project web page and remembered something about CO2 levels long before we humans came to be. So I read a little more. And a little more... And suddenly, the AGW fraud was clear before my eyes.
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Sept 1, 2015 7:30:11 GMT
Long time no see hope all is well? Thanks, Charlie. All fairly well, yes. Old heart with some problems, for sure, but that is just time going on, of course. But with taking care of my two little grandchildren and having fun with Spain politics, my free moments for climate make me almost only a reader.
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Aug 31, 2015 7:20:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Aug 16, 2015 15:37:03 GMT
Antarctic sea ice is diminishing since July, and that melting needs energy, that must be sucked from somewhere... could these two things, that east cooling and disappearing ice be connected somehow?
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Apr 11, 2015 8:55:33 GMT
The Church Of Climate Scientology: How Climate Science Became A Religion"How do we protect ourselves against such abuses of science? By knowing the one key difference between real scientists and science abusers. Science abusers treat science as an infallible authority to be blindly obeyed by the public. Real scientists treat science as a method to be carefully explained to the public. By this standard, today’s vaunted “climate science consensus”—that it’s been scientifically proven that we need to dismantle the fossil fuel industry, the economic engine of the world—is more Scientology than science."
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Apr 1, 2015 7:44:28 GMT
Well, in summary, was there or not a 2014-2015 El Niño?
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Mar 31, 2015 8:44:33 GMT
Thank you very much, Astromet.
Well, I am almost 64 and my heart is too weak, so I don´t know how long I will stay around here. But I am trying to tell my daughter that, for her own good and that of my granchildren, she must be aware and prepared. I hope she will.
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Mar 8, 2015 9:02:16 GMT
The problem, Sig, is that your link is not to an image, but to a page. If, when you are at that page, click the right button on the image, you can choose in the emerging list the " copy image URL" option (or something similar; I use Spanish language) and THAT is the link that you must use. Sig´s image:
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Feb 14, 2015 16:18:21 GMT
I thought science had settled all that and shown near synchronous temp increases ( initial rises followed by decades of further warming until equilibrium is reached)? Nope. Pseudo explanations from GIGO models with no evidence are not science. Specially when you have that at the middle of the wave the (almighty) CO2 levels remain at full force and nevertheless temperatures start to fall... and fall ... and fall...
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Nov 5, 2014 19:49:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Nov 2, 2014 16:41:55 GMT
drkstrong wrote: "The oceans cannot be "outgassing" to cause the trend as they are absorbing more CO2 then they release at the moment that is why the pH of the oceans is decreasing (i.e., acidifying)."New paper finds the oceans are a net source of CO2 to the atmospherehockeyschtick.blogspot.com.es/2013/09/new-paper-finds-oceans-are-net-source.html A new paper published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles proposes large revisions to the ocean carbon cycle based upon observations and models, finding the global oceans act as a net source of CO2 to the atmosphere. … The authors find middle-layer carbon flux toward the ocean surface exceeds flux to the ocean depths ["subduction"] by 11 Petagrams of carbon per year, which by comparison is significantly more carbon than generated by all man-made activities [8.8 Petagrams of carbon per year]. In other words, the deep oceans naturally contribute more carbon to the middle ocean layers [between 25-150 meters deep] than produced by all of man's activities combined.
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Oct 31, 2014 17:20:52 GMT
But code... that was just ironic, of course. Could´t you see it among the letters?
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Sept 21, 2014 7:59:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by hrizzo on Sept 6, 2014 7:36:53 GMT
Ratty wrote: "Not much help? There are other graphs on the page, all showing the gradual (?) decline in the North." Maybe not, but there are a couple more graphics. And one of them shows Nimbus 1964 data: and the article adds: "the data also suggests Nimbus I mean extent of Arctic sea ice in the 60s quite similar to that of 70 and 80."
|
|