|
Post by missouriboy on Aug 12, 2016 7:30:01 GMT
I just had to include Bob's graphs for the Arctic Ocean SSTs and the Southern Ocean SSTs. Perhaps this has been mentioned before, but it can't hurt to mention again ... note the abrupt shift in anomaly sign in 2007 in both oceans ... and the extreme variance in both. So what happened in 2007? We hit solar minimum yes ... but am I missing something? Do others have a clue to what I'm missing? Because it seems big.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Aug 12, 2016 10:22:40 GMT
The pachyderm in the room?
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Aug 14, 2016 22:46:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Sept 12, 2016 19:44:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Sept 12, 2016 19:53:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Sept 12, 2016 23:51:53 GMT
When you're down to invoking the four horsemen of the apocalypse, you must be out of science.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Sept 13, 2016 0:25:38 GMT
They must think that nobody thinks when they read these things. First they say ... For several decades, more energy has been absorbed than emitted at the top of Earth’s atmosphere. According to Gregory Johnson, an oceanographer at NOAA, the rate of energy gained between 1971 and 2010 was roughly equal to the power required to run 140 billion 1,500-watt hair dryers over the same number of years. The rate has only increased in the past decade. This excess energy has largely been sucked up by the oceans, Doesn't this suggest a solar source? ? Then they say ... The oceans act as Earth’s enormous heat sponge, sheltering continents and the people who live on them from atmospheric extremes. The near-surface ocean takes only decades to warm in response to elevated greenhouse gas concentrations,Perhaps they just left out something.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 24, 2017 4:27:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jan 24, 2017 5:22:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 24, 2017 7:11:17 GMT
Yet we know that is not true as the oceans are if anything cooled by any 'downwelling' infrared as it causes evaporation removing latent heat of evaporation and so speeds up the cooling from the hydrologic cycle. As more than 66% of the surface of the Earth is water the downwelling infrared will cool the Earth overall. The clouds formed by the condensation of the water vapor will then act to increase albedo and reduce the amount of incoming higher frequency energy that could have warmed the oceans.
But the CAGW proponents, all blowing on their coffees to keep them warm, do not seem to do basic observational science.
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Jan 26, 2017 22:23:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jan 26, 2017 23:43:10 GMT
I'm open to anything other than the "CO2 is the only driver of climate" theory. Interesting read; shame I'm not qualified to comment. " The ocean is an incredibly dynamic, constantly changing three dimensional system." Like the rest of the climate, apart from the number of dimensions?
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 27, 2017 1:21:27 GMT
I'm open to anything other than the "CO2 is the only driver of climate" theory. Interesting read; shame I'm not qualified to comment. " The ocean is an incredibly dynamic, constantly changing three dimensional system." Like the rest of the climate, apart from the number of dimensions? Join every other climate scientist in the world, Ratty.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 27, 2017 1:36:17 GMT
Good article Acid. As we already saw, more wind results in cooling because of upwelling/mixing. Therefore, the most logical conclusion here is that warming seas enhanced global wind speed and that global wind speed in turn started the cooling process.Only thing I'd add would be ... and if the sun cools down when you're already cooling the oceans, you're screwed.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jan 27, 2017 3:34:12 GMT
Not sure I'm a fan of "logical conclusions" any more .......
|
|